UHStats

Loading match banner and scoreboard…

UHStats

MVP

PeRcH72

16

ACC

pho`

13%

CLUTCH-

LAMA

pho`

6

Red

0

Player	Score	Kills	Deaths	Suicides	Shots	360	K/D	Eff	Acc	TTL
pho`FB	11	6	1	0	46	20.3 cm	6.00	86%	13%	12:21
Team Total	11	6	1	0	46	20.3 cm	6.00	86%	13%	12:21

Blue

Winner

1

Player	Score	Kills	Deaths	Suicides

Loading ctf player breakdown…

Team Balance

Red versus Blue balance for this match only.

Red6 kills · 6.00 K/D · 86% eff

pho`

Score: 0Players: 1Deaths: 1Damage: 0Accuracy: 13%

CTF MVP Balance11 MVP pts · 0 flag events

pho`

Grabs: 0Pickups: 0Caps: 0Assists: 0Solos: 0Flag Kills: 0Covers: 0Returns: 0Mid Returns: 0Clutch: 0Cherries: 0

Blue1 kills · 0.17 K/D · 14% eff

PeRcH72

Loading match timelines…

Kills Matchup

Killer and victim pairings by team.

Red TeamKills6

Killer	Victim
pho`	PeRcH72	6

Blue TeamKills1

Killer	Victim
PeRcH72	pho`	1

Player	Double	Multi	Ultra	Monster	Ludicrous	Holy Shit	Best
pho`				1			5 kills

Player	Killing Spree	Rampage	Dominating	Unstoppable	Godlike	Best
pho`	1					6 kills

Loading mode-specific match stats…

Loading connection details…

Player Performance

Loading player feedback...

Player feedback is loading after the match details.

Match Report

Generated from the match events and player statistics.

A tight game of 1v1 Instagib CTF took place on CTF-andACTION-Misty between Red and Blue Team, ending 0-1 in favour of Blue Team.

The opening breakthrough came at 12:21 when PeRcH72 scored for Blue Team. Blue Team created more scoring chances, converting 1 of the 1 captures. The scoring pattern stayed relatively stable once the first lead was established. 1 capture was completed solo.

pho` supplied the sharpest shooting numbers, finishing with 13% accuracy and 6 kills.

Lama watch: pho` finished with 6 lama score from 6 kills and 0 objective actions, which is the stats page politely asking what the plan was.

Blue Team ultimately secured the result through stronger capture conversion and late-game control.

CTF MVP

Final Equinox gain: Match Score plus flag-run, objective, defensive baseline, shared team, and personal penalty adjustments.

Rank	Player	Role	Grabs	Caps	Assists	Solos	Flag Kills	Def FK/BNS	Flag Run	Pickups	Covers	Mid Returns	Cherries	Returns	CLUTCH	MVP Score
-	PeRcH72	Attacker	0	0	0	0	0	0/-	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	16
-	pho`	Attacker	0	0	0	0	0	0/-	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	11

Connection

Uses the match ngLog and UHNet connection values: client NetSpeed, client FPS when logged, and ping samples across the match. Min, Avg and Max summarise the ping range, the trace shows the connection pattern, and spikes mark sudden jumps.

Player	Client NetSpeed	Client FPS	Refresh	Min	Avg	Max	Spikes	Ping Trace	Pattern
pho`	25000	400	280Hz	21	21	21	0		Good connection
PeRcH72	25000	300	175Hz	18	19	20	0		Good connection

Player Performance

Match feedback based on the player's usual level and their role in this game.

Player	Verdict	Role	Performance Notes
pho`	Feeding	Defender	This was a hard outing for you at 0.26x; treat it as a reset point, not a verdict on your ability. You had defensive involvement, but your next step is being first to the danger more often, not just reacting after the grab. 86% efficiency shows the fight selection was generally good. Next focus: cover the flag carriers when you can, but make sure your own flag is safe first.
PeRcH72	Feeding	Defender	This was a hard outing for you at 0.14x; treat it as a reset point, not a verdict on your ability. As a defender, you were involved, but earlier reads on incoming grabs and cleaner return positioning would lift your game. 14% efficiency points to too many low-value duels; wait for support or fight from stronger positions. Next focus: keep reading the incoming routes, but add more cover for your own returning carrier when the flag is safe.